Archive for January, 2009

Green Building : Green Abode

The difference between a green building and a conventional building is in the approach and a conscious effort to reduce consumption of energy

Over the last decade, as the Indian economy underwent liberalization with multinationals making their way into the country, India saw a boom in infrastructure development especially with the real estate sector growing phenomenally. However, in the wake of development, conserving the environment was a challenge which the real estate sector had to address. According to the Jones Lang LaSalle Meghraj study, the real estate industry is one of the biggest emitter of green house gases in India. The study goes on to mention that as per a report by the Ministry of Power in June 2004, 2025% electricity consumed in government buildings was wasted due to inefficient design.

The green building movement gained tremendous impetus over the last six years. With a modest beginning of 20,000 sq ft green built-up area in the country in 2003, today more than 300 green buildings with a built-up area of over 230 mn sq ft are being constructed all over India, says S Srinivas, senior counsellor, CII-Sohrabji Godrej Green Business Center.

Defining a green building, Dalip Sharma, MD, Delta Electronics says, Green building, also known as a sustainable building, is a structure that is designed, built, renovated, operated, or reused in an ecological and resource-efficient manner. Green buildings are designed to meet certain objectives such as protecting occupant health; improving employee productivity; using energy, water, and other resources more efficiently; and reducing the overall impact to the environment.

While from the exterior there is no visible difference between a green building and a conventional one, the difference is in the approach, concern towards the environment, and a conscious effort to cut down the use of resources like energy, and an attempt to provide comfort and safety to occupants.

Standards Play
According to the theme paper of Green Building Congress 2008, an important development in the growth of the Green Building Movement has been the indigenisation and launch of LEED-India Green Building rating system for New Construction and Core & Shell. LEED India rating system has been designed to suit the Indian construction industry context.

To facilitate the adoption of green building practices relevant to the local climate and regional practices, the IGBC is also working on the development of new rating programs. While most environment experts have been focused on making commercial buildings green, IGBC has introduced a welcome program for making homes green as well. The IGBC Green Homes launched in May this year is the first rating program developed to address the residential sector in the country. More than sixty-five buildings with a built-up area of about 88 mn sq ft are being designed as per the IGBC Green Homes rating criteria.

Meanwhile, LEED is not alone, so as to say. The Energy Resources Institute (TERI) has also come out with a certified process named as Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment (GRIHA), which has been adopted by the Government of India. It is a 100-point system focused on design efficiency, rather than just upfront usage of technology, addressing peculiar Indian issues like the underground water table, etc. Over 30 GRIHA certified projects are in various stages of construction, from a Center for Environmental Science in Kanpur to Fortis Hospitals in different cities. GRIHA could be the homegrown challenger to LEED.

 

But whatever be the outcome one thing is certain that, in the coming days one will be able to see and work in a lot of these green buildings. That is not only good for the employees, and the employers but also for the nation at large.

Government Intervention
While some believe that proactive measures on the part of the government is required to encourage the construction of green building, Srinivas differs. The concept of green building is based on the premise of companies opting voluntarily for it. Therefore to expect the government to incentivise is incorrect, he says.

According to Jones Lang LaSalle Meghraj study, the government did launch the Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC) under the National Building Codes and Standards. This code is voluntary and is applicable to buildings or building complexes that have a connected load of 500 KW or a contract demand of 600 KVA, whichever is greater.

On the design front, traditionally consultants were appointed in the due course of the project, leading to no interaction between the various designers who worked on the project. However things have changed for the better today, as an architect can contribute in various aspects like orientation, envelope design and selection of materials leading to energy efficiency.

Many doubts have been raised over the cost efficiency of a green building vis–vis a conventional building. Even though the cost of a green building could be higher than a traditional building, yet this has to be seen in a different light because the baseline cost for all comparisons needs to be similar.

The incremental cost is always relative and depends on the extent of eco-friendly features included in the design stage. The incremental cost would appear small if the baseline design is already at a certain level of good eco-design; it would appear huge if the base design has not considered green principles. Moreover in any other building, the operating cost would work out to be 80-85% of the capital cost while the one time incremental cost is only about 8-10%. But in a green building, reducing operational costs leads to reduced total cost of ownership.

Since its inception in 2001, the concept of Green Building has gained tremendous popularity not only among the environmentalists but also the developer community and corporate as well. And an indication is the growing number of LEED-certified green projects. IGBC also undertook a unique initiative of Green Home rating program for certifying green homes. Perhaps in times to come, the Indian real estate with active participation from all stakeholders would see the proliferation of green buildings in India.

Leave a comment »

Managing e-Waste requires planning

For many IT departments, the first response to the emergence of green IT has been to focus on energy consumption in the data center. Moreover, the talk begins there and many programs never move beyond that point. However, the reality is that companies can do much more to reduce IT’s environmental footprint while significantly reducing costs. Think of a zero-impact approach to recycling e-Waste.

Information on a product’s packaging is twice as important as a product’s design to consumers assessing technology’s green-ness. What is required is comprehensive planning in designing product, their packaging and recycling.

Think environmentally

“Even our finished goods are packaged in biodegradable cartons for products and accessories. The packaging also uses re-usable cushion material for example High Density Poly Ethylene covers are used so that they can be recycled”

- Ashok Tripathy
General Manager & Head, Personal Computing Division, Wipro Infotech

“The rapid decline of the
price-to-performance ratio has resulted in huge capacity creation in computing infrastructure. At the same time, the rapid rate of technology obsolescence has lead to the burden of e-Waste”

- Rajdeep Sahrawat
Vice President, NASSCOM

“We received far less e-Waste in CY 2008 than the normal level, which was about three tons per day. Most of the IT vendors have decided to extend their usage of hardware and not to scrap the same”

- P Parthasarathy
Director, E-Parisaraa Pvt Ltd

“HP is designing its products to use fewer and more environmentally sound materials that are easier to reuse and recycle. For example, up to 40% of the glass in the new HP CRT monitors is recycled from
discarded monitors”

- P Ravindranath
Director, Public Affairs, HP India

e-Waste is a global concern today. It can have far-reaching adverse effects on the environment if not dealt with immediately. Awareness of e-Waste management is the key to getting more customers to come forward and dispose of their e-Waste in a safe manner. Customers must know that the way to dispose their e-Waste is simple. Their interest and attention to this aspect will go a long way in keeping out the dangers of e-Waste.

When it comes to environmental objectives, the ultimate goal is to minimize the factors that contribute to the global climate problem and prevent waste from poisoning the environment or harming human health. While carbon emission is one of the primary culprits, eliminating harmful e-Waste is another important goal. Many organizations believe they have already accomplished this objective, but according to the market followers, 80% of e-Waste collected for recycling is exported overseas where dismantling shops lack the processes to prevent hazardous materials from harming workers and the environment.

Ironically Bangalore’s IT and related companies produce 11,000-12,000 tons of e-Waste annually and most of this finds its way to backyard recyclers in the by-lanes of Bangalore and very little goes to the authorized e-Waste managers who are competent to neutralize this waste. P Parthasarathy, Director, E-Parisaraa Pvt Ltd., [an authorized e-Waste recycle service provider] said, “Many IT companies prefer to sell their e-Waste to the highest bidder from unauthorized e-Waste traders as they offer a better deal.” He added, “We received far less e-Waste in CY 2008 than the normal level, which was about three tons per day. This year IT companies have junked only 500 tons of e-Waste to us. The reason for less collection is attributed to slowdown in the IT industry. Most of the IT vendors have decided to extend their usage of hardware and not to scrap it immediately.”

Nevertheless, not all e-Waste generated annually comes from IT hardware. Parthasarathy said, “Of the 500 tons of e-Waste that we received in CY 2008, only 70% was IT related such as CRT/LCD monitors, motherboards, CPU/cabinet, key boards, mouse, lithium ion batteries from notebook PCs and motherboards, printers, toners and servers (contributes about 5%) and more.” HP, IBM, Intel, Lucent, Infosys, Motorola, Accenture, GE, Arissent are some of the IT vendors with whom E-Parisaraa works closely to recycle IT components.

Leave a comment »

Microsoft’s Publishes Green Exchange Server Document – Virtualized to Save Energy & Hardware

Introduction With the release of Microsoft Windows Server 2008 with Hyper-V and Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008, a virtualized Exchange 2007 SP1 server is no longer restricted to the realm of the lab; it can be deployed in a production environment and receive full support from Microsoft. This past August, we published our support policies and recommendations for virtualizing Exchange, but many people have asked us to go beyond that guidance and weigh-in on the more philosophical question: is virtualization is a good idea when it comes to Exchange? Due to the performance and business requirements of Exchange, most deployments would benefit from deployment on physical servers. However, there are some scenarios in which a virtualized Exchange 2007 infrastructure may allow you to realize real benefits in terms of space, power, and deployment flexibility. Presented here are sample scenarios in which virtualization may make sense, as well as checklists to help you evaluate whether the current load on your infrastructure makes it a good candidate for virtualization. Microsoft’s Exchange team did their homework and gave examples where you would use a virtualized exchange environment. Small Office with High Availability Some organizations are small but they still require enterprise-class availability. For example, consider Contoso Ltd., a fictitious company that regards email as a critical service and has several small branch office site(s) consisting of 250 users. Contoso wants to keep their e-mail environment on-premises for legal reasons and they want to have a fully redundant email system. Contoso’s users have average user profiles and the mailboxes are sized at 2 GB. Remote or Branch Office with High Availability In the early days of Exchange server, organizations needed to place local Exchange servers in remote and branch offices to provide sufficient performance. With improvements such as Cached Exchange Mode and Outlook Anywhere (RPC over HTTPS), consolidating those servers to a central datacenter became the recommended approach. However, in some situations, poor network connectivity to remote offices still requires some organizations to have a local Exchange server. Often the user populations at these locations are so small that it doesn’t make sense to dedicate a whole physical server to the Exchange environment. The technical considerations in this scenario are the same as described in the “Small Office with High Availability” scenario above. For an example of how a company used Hyper-V in this scenario, refer to the case study on Caspian Pipeline Consortium. Disaster Recovery In order to provide redundancy for a remote site, some organizations may require a Warm Site that contains a duplicate of the primary production Exchange 2007 infrastructure. The intent of this standby site is to provide as near to the same level of functionality as possible in the event of the loss of the primary site. However, keeping a duplicate infrastructure for standby purposes, although useful for high SLA requirements, can be prohibitively expensive for some organizations. In that event, it is possible to provide a virtual duplicate of the entire primary site using Hyper-V. A typical Warm Site configuration utilizing physical Exchange 2007 servers would include one or more servers configured together as a standby cluster and one or more other servers configured as a CAS/Hub server. To achieve redundancy of just the messaging services within the Warm Site, a total of four physical servers would be needed. By contrast, a Hyper-V-based solution with only three physical servers can provide an organization with a Warm Site that includes two Mailbox servers in a CCR environment, as well as and redundant CAS, and Hub servers. Thus, by virtualizing Exchange in this scenario, you can provide a higher level of services to your users while also saving on hardware, power and cooling costs as well as space requirements when compared to a similarly configured physical solution. The following diagram illustrates one such configuration. Mobile LAN There are situations in which a company, agency, or governmental department may need a complete network infrastructure that can be deployed to specific locations at a moment’s notice. This infrastructure is then connected to the organization’s network via satellite or similar remote WAN technology. For example, a non-governmental organization (NGO) may need to react to a disaster and set up local servers to serve an affected community. This subset of servers would need to be completely self-contained and able to provide all necessary server services to the personnel located in the target location. If you think virtualizing Exchange or other Mail Servers consider these scenarios where Virtualization can make you Greener.

Comments (1) »

Sun Leverages Experience with Green Data Centers

Sun Micro completes green data center in Broomfield, Colorado and leverages the best practice experiences of its previous datacenter designs. Rasied floor space was dramatically reduced and energy efficiency resulted in $1million of operating savings. …

… “The new Broomfield datacenter follows similar Sun projects completed in Blackwater, UK, Santa Clara, Calif. and Bangalore, India in August 2007. It builds on designs used in Sun’s Santa Clara datacenter and features water savings, chemical reduction, free air cooling and flywheel uninterruptible power supply (UPS). As in Santa Clara, the Broomfield datacenter is based on Sun’s Pod Architecture, which delivers dramatic footprint compression while still providing capacity for future growth. ” …

Via Sun Microsystems: Energy Efficient, Flexible Datacenter

For Video

http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1640183659/bctid9104837001 

Leave a comment »

Commoditization of Virtualization Technology, Time to Create a Model

 

One of the lessons I from Donald Trump, is there are only two things important to executives – does it work and I am getting a deal.

Bottom line: out of all the complexity of Green projects, all the various issues, there are only 2 things an executive wants to hear.

  1. Is it working?
  2. Did we get a good deal?

Anything else is not important.

With the current economy and deployment of virtualized solutions, virtualization has reached the stage of commoditization, and now users are looking for deals. To find the best value, requires looking at the Virtualization Solution holistically and adding up the total costs for the solution. The first place people look is the processor and virtualization software. Experienced hardware oriented people know RAM, Storage, I/O, and networking are next in costs and can have a dramatic impact on the overall performance of a virtualized solution. Next is the monitoring and management of the virtualized environment and how that data can be used to optimize the solution while meetings SLAs.  With rising power costs and climate change managing your cost the performance per watt is prudent.

A term used frequently for this approach is rightsizing. Keeping all these issues in mind, picking the right server hardware and software configurations has a huge effect on your efficiencies.  Whether you are in production for web, database, or applications; or development and test; the choices of what configuration you pick and what combination of virtualized environments are now the big decisions on how efficient you are.

This exercise is analogous to picking your vehicle fleet and your method to load those vehicles. Think like the experts at UPS what vehicle you pick, the route chosen, and how it is loaded all effect the overall cost and service level.  Speaking of UPS they have an interesting white paper on category management.  Category management is one approach to commoditization of things.

image

Model
This last step enhances the category review step from the original eight-step process. The category review process has typically involved perhaps hundreds of work hours to complete. This step needs to be backed by decision support and modeling capabilities. Category managers need to be able to simulate category performance results from changes in various inputs – category strategies, definitions, roles and tactics.

UPS has added the step of modeling which is done by few. 

To get you started on virtual system modeling check out this DMTF document.

The CIM system virtualization model, including CIM schema additions and a set of supporting profile documents, enables the management of system virtualization. Virtualization is a substitution process producing virtual resources which change aspects of the way consumers interact with the resources. These virtual resources are usually based on underlying physical resources, but they may have different properties or qualities. For example, virtual resources may have different capacities or sizes than the underlying resources or may have different qualities of service, such as improved performance or reliability. In system virtualization a host computer system provides the underlying resources that compose virtual computer systems and their constituent virtual devices.

Leave a comment »

Google Throttles Data Center Spending, Is it Good or Bad?

Google Throttles Back on Data Center Spending

January 22nd, 2009 : Rich Miller Google (GOOG) spent $368 million on its infrastructure in the fourth quarter of 2008 as it scaled back its ambitious data center building boom, idling a $600 million project. The fourth quarter capital expenditure (CapEx) total, which was included in today’s earnings release, was less than half the  $842 million Google spent on its data centers in the first quarter of 2008.  Here’s a look at the recent trend:    

  • 1Q 2006: $345 million
  • 2Q 2006: $699 million
  • 3Q 2006: $492 million
  • 4Q 2006: $367 million
  • 1Q 2007: $597 million
  • 2Q 2007: $575 million
  • 3Q 2007: $553 million
  • 4Q 2007: $678 million
  • 1Q 2008: $842 million
  • 2Q 2008: $698 million
  • 3Q 2008: $452 million
  • 4Q 2008:$368 million

Is this Good or Bad?

I think it is good as it shows Google is adapting to its customer requirements.  With the slowing economy, many Google groups have reigned in their growth forecasts, shouldn’t the date center construction slow as well?

What would be bad is if Google built relentlessly building more capacity than it needed.

The benefit Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have is they can think on scale the rest of the public can’t.  They fill data centers in a fraction of time others do.  So, data center construction can more closely match server deployments, and IT is a cyclical business.

Leave a comment »

e-waste

What is e-waste?

Electronic Waste – or e-waste – is the term used to describe old, end-of-life electronic appliances such as computers,laptops, TVs, DVD players, mobile phones, mp3 players etc. which have been disposed of by their original users. While there is no generally accepted definition of e-waste, in most cases, e-waste comprises of relatively expensive and essentially durable products used for data processing, telecommunications or entertainment in private households and businesses.

Public perception of e-waste is often restricted to a narrower sense, comprising mainly of end-of-life information- & telecommunication equipment and consumer electronics. However, technically, electronic waste is only a subset of WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment). According to the OECD any appliance using an electric power supply that has reached its end-of-life would come under WEEE.

WEEE Categories

    Large household appliances
    Small household appliances
    IT and telecommunications equipment
    Consumer equipment
    Lighting equipment
    Electrical and electronic tools (with the exception of large-scale stationary industrial tools)
    Toys, leisure and sports equipment
    Medical devices (with the exception of all implanted and infected products)
    Monitoring and control instruments
    Automatic dispensers
    City Initiatives  
     

    Bangalore
    Bangalore, the undoubted center of the IT industry in India, was the first city in India to have sent a WEEE wake-up call. Two workshops aptly titled ‘WEEE Care!’ hosted by the Goethe Institute in collaboration with the KSPCB and the Indo-German-Swiss eWaste Initiative brought the issue to the fore and forced all stakeholders to collaborate to find solutions to a looming problem.
    Subsequently the E-Waste Agency (EWA) was founded in 2005, a think tank to devise strategies for an improved e-waste management in Bangalore. At the same time formal as  well as informal e-waste recyclers were supported with training to gain an authorized status, thus be allowed to recycle e-waste.
    Presently large consumers and producers such as IT companies have started to work on a code of conduct regarding e-waste management, which will be used to operate a Clean eWaste Channel in the Electronics City.
    To know more about the latest developments on WEEE in Bangalore, go to Bangalore Workgroup Homepage on WEEE Workweb India.

    Mumbai
    Mumbai, the financial nerve-centre of India, is also India’s largest port city. The Mumbai -Pune industrial belt is also one of the manufacturing hubs of the country. As a result, Mumbai is not only the port of import for new and used electronics, it is also home to a large user and manufacturer base, both generating large volumes of e-waste.
    To know more about the latest developments on WEEE in Mumbai go to Mumbai Workgroup Homepage on WEEE Workweb India

    NEW!! MPCB calling for consultants to conduct e-waste assessment. Deadline for submission: 5th December, 2005. >> more details

    New Delhi
    To know more about the latest developments on WEEE in New Delhi go to New Delhi Workgroup Homepage on WEEE Workweb India

    Partners  
     
    A brief profile of the partners of the initiative.

    MoEF: The Ministry of Environment & Forests is the nodal agency in the administrative structure of the Central Government, for the planning, promotion, co-ordination and overseeing the implementation of environmental and forestry programmes. The Ministry is also the Nodal agency in the country for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

       

    CPCB: The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), an autonomous organization under the MoEF is the apex organization in India for prevention and control of pollution. Among the many functions of the CPCB, it plays an important role in drafting guidelines, advising the MoEF on policy issues, conducting field tests and coordinating the activities of the state pollution control boards.

       

    BMZ: The BMZ develops the guidelines and concepts of German development policy. It determines the long-term strategies of co-operation with the different participants and defines the rules for their execution. This principle task results in the development of common projects with the partner countries in the same way as on the international level.

       

    GTZ: The GTZ (German Technical Cooperation) is an international cooperation enterprise for sustainable development with worldwide operations. GTZ is a federal enterprise which was founded in 1975 as a company under private law. GTZ has a worldwide network of partnerships in civil society and in economic and cultural spheres. It has always cooperated closely with other national and international development cooperation organizations. In India, GTZ looks back to almost forty years of experience in executing Technical Cooperation projects and programmes on behalf of the Federal Republic of Germany. Advisory Services in Environmental Management (ASEM) is a joint programme of the GTZ and the Indian Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) focusing on urban and industrial environmental management sustainable development.

       

    SECO: The seco is the Swiss Confederation’s competence centre for all core issues relating to economic policy. The Directorate for “Economic Development Cooperation” of seco in provides assistance to projects promoting sustainable economic development and the integration of developing and transition companies into the global economy. In 2003 seco initiated the Knowledge Partnerships programme in e-waste for developing and transition countries.

       

    EMPA: Empa is an independent, neutral institution for multidisciplinary research into sustainable materials and systems engineering. Within Empa, the competence center for electronic waste recycling forms part of the technology and society laboratory which analyses the impacts of technological developments on society and the environment. EMPA is the technical monitoring centre for electrical and electronic waste working on contracts from the Swiss Association for Information, Communication and Organisation Technology (SWICO) and from S.EN.S. to do regular audits in recycling facilities; E-waste recycling is one of EMPA’s research topics, both on the level of material flows and on the component level (Lillehammer Award 2002).

Leave a comment »

Companies must build power and e-waste solutions into their budgets and RFPs

Companies must build power and e-waste solutions into their budgets and RFPs.The greening of the technology industry is a trend thats developing with impressive velocity, and with good reason.

According to the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, e-waste is the fastest-growing part of the waste stream, and the Environmental Protection Agency estimates e-waste accounts for 2 percent of the municipal solid waste stream in the United States.

Whats more, the toxicity of many materials that drive modern IT operations means that e-waste can end up exacting a higher toll on public health than its 2 percent share would suggest. More than 1,000 chemicals used during electronics production, such as lead, mercury and cadmium, have been linked to cancer, reproductive problems and other illnesses.

Meanwhile, now that technology is as essential to enterprises as the air we breathe, the demand on our power grids has forced technology companies to begin creating and manufacturing more energy-efficient and sustainable products to reduce power consumption.

Certainly, there are environmental reasons for going green, but a green focus also can result in significant savings. Whereas in 1996, when IT departments spent 17 cents of every dollar powering and cooling a new server, IT departments 10 years later were shelling out 48 cents per dollar, according to a September 2006 IDC report. IDC also predicts that number will grow to 70 cents per dollar by 2010. Whatever the goals, IT managers have more options than ever for getting their companies thinking and acting green. eWeek Labs has created the following guide that will help make your company a better friend not only to the planet but also to your organizations pocketbook.

 

The Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition estimates there are 500 million obsolete computers in the United States, and 130 million cell phones are thrown out every year.

Indeed, e-waste is a major problem that can no longer be resolved by tossing end-of-life electronics into a nearby trash bin or landfill.

Leave a comment »

Green Computing in The Architecture Journal and TechNet Magazine

Microsoft has recently published new resources for Architects and IT professionals focused on Green Computing. These offer very good and deep resources to help with your Green IT initiatives.

The Architecture Journal devotes an entire issue to Green IT this month. Entitled “Green Computing,” Journal 18 covers a variety of topics, including:

· Environmentally Sustainable Infrastructure Design

· Green Maturity Model for Virtualization

· Application Patterns for Green IT

· Project Genome: Wireless Sensor Network for Data Center Cooling

· Profiling Energy Usage for Efficient Consumption

· Green IT in Practice: SQL Server Consolidation in Microsoft IT

TechNet Magazine includes an article on power management implementation with Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Microsoft System Center in its December Issue. The article is part of TechNet’s commitment to providing Green IT technical guidance for IT Professionals. (Additional Articles can be found in the Sustainable Computing topic area.)

Leave a comment »

EPA eCycling Program Hits New High

 

Plug-In To eCycling is a partnership between the EPA and leading consumer electronics manufacturers and retailers that fosters opportunities for consumers to donate or recycle their used electronics.

“Our Plug-In partners are continuing to develop programs that help consumers protect the environment,” said Susan Bodine, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. “It’s exciting to see these programs mature rapidly at a time when people are increasingly looking for ways to do their part by recycling their used electronics.”

    Plug-In to eCycling partners increased their recovery rate by 30 percent in 2008.

Plug-In to eCycling partners increased their recovery rate by 30 percent in 2008.

Recycling electronics conserves resources and energy needed to manufacture new materials. In 2008, Plug-In partners prevented the release of greenhouse gases equal to the annual emissions from approximately 15,500 cars.

The e-waste programs have tailored the collection of consumer electronics for reuse and recycling in a variety of ways, such as in-store take back, mail-in recycling, online trade-in and hosting local collection events.

Highlights from some of the Plug-In partners include:

  • Dell/Staples – Consumers can recycle any Dell-branded computer product for free at any Staples store in the U.S.
  • Best BuyA pilot program at 134 stores to test in-store take back of selected consumer electronics
  • Sony - An expansion of its partnership with Waste Management to more than 160 drop-off locations in the U.S., where consumers can recycle any Sony-branded products for free
  • LG - The launch of its partnership with Waste Management, also offering free recycling of LG, Zenith and Goldstar brands
  • Samsung – The company’s Recycling Direct program, available at more than 170 U.S. locations and its partnership with Walmart, in which Durabrand and Ilo electronic products (two private brands formerly sold by Walmart) can be recycled at Samsung’s Recycling Direct locations
  • Electronic Manufacturers Recycling Management Company – A partnership between Panasonic, Sharp and Toshiba and Goodwill Industries of Central Texas to pilot television collection and recycling
  • Toshiba – The company’s free online takeback services for any brand of selected consumer electronics

Since the program’s inception in 2003, Plug-In partners have recycled more than 200 million pounds of electronics.

Leave a comment »