Archive for February, 2009

C-Change ‘09: Green IT

According to a survey recently conducted to see how green is India Inc. today, some interesting points have come up. 
43.5 percent of MNCs feel that Green IT is a reality, while 39.6 percent of Indian private limited companies feel the same. And, 52 percent of the PSUs felt it was a reality as well.

One of the questions asked was – What is Green IT? The top three responses were:
* Configure desktops to enter the sleep mode when not in use: 33.2 percent
* E-waste/computer waste recycling: 30.2 percent
* Server consolidation: 29.2 percent
Is Green IT among your top 3 opex costs?
* Capex cost — hitting the backup envelope.
This is a significant issue for those in areas with high power outages. Telcos have towers all over the place. You could also hit the backup envelope if you are having a new setup.
* Remote area operation
* Is energy 3 percent of your turnover?
- Is it 5 percent of net margins? Or, 10 percent of opex?

Are the companies aware of green standards? The top three responses were:
* 51.5 percent of the respondents were aware of the Energy Star.
* 39.9 percent were aware of the ISO14000/ISO14001
* 32.8 percent were aware of the Climate Saver Computing Initiative

As for data center, server management, 26.3 percent had already implemented upgrading or reconfiguring the data center cooling infrastructure for improved efficiency. And, 31.4 percent had already implemented reduction of server power consumption using thin client architecture.

Indeed, green for tough times. The key points here is, green within the IT environment. Beyond the IT environment; and well, why now? According to the survey, 35 percent said that less than 5 percent of the IT budgets had been provisioned for green.

As for green buildings, and especially, regular monitoring of carbon footprint, very few have done; but many said they will start in next six months.

Why Green IT? A majority, 78 percent, said it was to reduce costs, and 54 percent felt that it is related to environmental issues. About 29 percent each also said it was for compliance and corporate image building.

 

Look at your total energy bill, including electricity and back-up. For most sectors today, one percent of top line can be interesting.
Capex example: Expansion or consolidation; for example, 400 seats going to 550 seats.
* Are you in a power cut zone?
* Can your power backup handle it?

Why have the backup envelope?
In the day time, the backup envelope is for supporting the complete operation of your organization. Everything has to be backed up during the day. What about the night? You may be spending more on backup on infrastructure that is not used! Some of the things we’ve seen people do and explore include:
* Natural light/minor rewiring
* Replacement policy: lights etc.
* LCDs, laptops; these may not directly apply, if you have a Capex freeze
* Cooling/insulation
* Server/app consolidation, virtualization? A lot of people have been looking at this area. We are exploring at Cybermedia how we can consolidate so
essential services are on maybe, 1-2 servers. Server consolidation may require a different, focused approach.

Standby power use? This can be pretty huge. If you are using standard phones, the power is 1-2W, If IP phones, the standby power is 8-10W. There are some vendors who give some energy efficient IP phones.

Is there someone in your organization charged with looking after your energy bill?
Most CIOs from the manufacturing segment indicated that yes, there is someone looking into this. However, so far, we have not come across CIOs who are in charge of the energy bill.
This role requires the person access to lot of information; knowledge about green building standards; and measurements for green energy are also required.

A CIO has to do correct, detailed assessment of the current process within the company. This is an area you can take up without treading on toes. This is something a CIO can actually take up, and look at as a role beyond the relevant domain of IT. They can look at the major leakage areas.

Green is good for business -
* Savings in capex and opex; small to big; short to long term.
* Corporate image; you may got support from the CEO if you have an overall picture.
* CIO opportunity; they can go to IT and beyond.

Comments (2) »

Energy Saving Tips From Google

Energy Saving Tips

Here are some more resources to help you find ways to reduce your energy use.

Heating and Cooling:

Saving Water:

Computing Equipment:

Electronics and Home Appliances:

  • Turn down the brightness on your TV and computer monitor
  • Look for and purchase ENERGY STAR appliances and electronics
  • Consider replacing that old, second refrigerator in the basement – This calculator determines how much energy your refrigerator is using
  • Plug home electronics into a powerstrip and turn off when not in use. Or unplug appliances that you rarely use – when was the last time you used that VCR?
  • Don’t keep your refrigerator and freezer too cold. Set temperature between 36-38 degrees F and freezers at 0-5 degrees.

Other Energy-saving Tips:

Government Programs:

Comments (3) »

The Next Footprint – Water

Yet Another ‘Footprint’ to Worry About: Water

Taking a Cue From Carbon Tracking, Companies and Conservationists Tally Hidden Sources of Consumption

It takes roughly 20 gallons of water to make a pint of beer, as much as 132 gallons of water to make a 2-liter bottle of soda, and about 500 gallons, including water used to grow, dye and process the cotton, to make a pair of Levi’s stonewashed jeans.
Though much of that water is replenished through natural cycles, a handful of companies have started tracking such “water footprints” as a growing threat of fresh-water shortages looms. Some are measuring not just the water used to make beverages and cool factories, but also the gallons used to grow ingredients such as cotton, sugar, wheat, tea and tomatoes. The drive, modeled partly on carbon footprinting, a widely used measurement of carbon-dioxide emissions, comes as groundwater reserves are being depleted and polluted at unsustainable rates in many regions. Climate change has caused glaciers to shrink, eroding vital sources of fresh water. And growing global demand for food and energy is placing even more pressure on diminishing supplies.
View Interactive

See how a variety of common products stack up when it comes to water use.
Two-thirds of the world’s population is projected to face water scarcity by 2025, according to the United Nations. In the U.S., water managers in 36 states anticipate shortages by 2013, a General Accounting Office report shows. Last year, Georgia lawmakers tried, unsuccessfully, to move the state’s border north so that Georgia could claim part of the Tennessee River.
Lately, water footprinting has gained currency among corporations seeking to protect their agricultural supply chains and factory operations from future water scarcity. Next week, representatives from about 100 companies, including Nike Inc., PepsiCo Inc., Levi Strauss & Co. and Starbucks Corp., will gather in Miami for a summit on calculating and shrinking corporate water footprints. In December, a coalition of scientists, companies and development agencies launched the Water Footprint Network, an international nonprofit

 

They didn’t discuss data centers in this article, but I am sure someone will take notice soon.

 

I was surprised to see they discussed the use of models to understand the impact.

 

Water-management experts have started to build models for “water offset” projects so that beverage companies and other heavy water users can soften their impact by funding water sanitation and conservation projects. PepsiCo recently piloted a program to help rice farmers cultivating 4,000 acres in India switch from flood irrigation to direct seeding, a planting method that requires less water and makes crops more resilient to drought.

 

Some of the people I have met who focus on modeling software are busier than ever and understand that Energy and Water use need to be built into Green Data Center Models.

Leave a comment »

Power to the people

Imagine how hard it would be to stick to a budget in a store with no prices. Well, that’s pretty much how we buy electricity today. Your utility company sends you a bill at the end of the month with very few details. Most people don’t know how much electricity their appliances use, where in the house they are wasting electricity, or how much the bill might go up during different seasons. But in a world where everyone had a detailed understanding of their home energy use, we could find all sorts of ways to save energy and lower electricity bills. In fact, studies show that access to home energy information results in savings between 5-15% on monthly electricity bills. It may not sound like much, but if half of America’s households cut their energy demand by 10 percent, it would be the equivalent of taking eight million cars off the road.

Google’s mission is to “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful,” and we believe consumers have a right to detailed information about their home electricity use. We’re tackling the challenge on several fronts, from policy advocacy to developing consumer tools, and even investing in smart grid companies. We’ve been participating in the dialogue in Washington, DC and with public agencies in the U.S. and other parts of the world to advocate for investment in the building of a “smart grid,” to bring our 1950s-era electricity grid into the digital age. Specifically, to provide both consumers and utilities with real-time energy information, homes must be equipped with advanced energy meters called “smart meters.” There are currently about 40 million smart meters in use worldwide, with plans to add another 100 million in the next few years.

But deploying smart meters alone isn’t enough. This needs to be coupled with a strategy to provide customers with easy access to energy information. That’s why we believe that open protocols and standards should serve as the cornerstone of smart grid projects, to spur innovation, drive competition, and bring more information to consumers as the smart grid evolves. We believe that detailed data on your personal energy use belongs to you, and should be available in an open standard, non-proprietary format. You should control who gets to see your data, and you should be free to choose from a wide range of services to help you understand it and benefit from it. For more details on our policy suggestions, check out the comments we filed yesterday with the California Public Utility Commission.

In addition to policy advocacy, we’re building consumer tools, too. Over the last several months, our engineers have developed a software tool called Google PowerMeter, which will show consumers their home energy information almost in real time, right on their computer. Google PowerMeter is not yet available to the public since we’re testing it out with Googlers first. But we’re building partnerships with utilities and independent device manufacturers to gradually roll this out in pilot programs. Once we’ve had a chance to kick the tires, we’ll make the tool more widely available.

There is no one-size-fits-all solution to providing consumers with detailed energy information. And it will take the combined efforts of federal and state governments, utilities, device manufacturers, and software engineers to empower consumers to use electricity more wisely by giving them access to energy information.

Leave a comment »

Who Will Compete Against Google’s PowerMeter?

Google has 227 news articles on their PowerMeter feature.  Sounds like they have a monopoly on mindshare. In less than 24 hours they have 227 news articles.

Google introduces power meter software to reduce electricity use
Telegraph.co.uk, United Kingdom – 21 hours ago
By Claudine Beaumont The Google PowerMeter software will analyse the consumption information captured by “smart meters“, and translate it into
Google announces PowerMeter Computerworld
Google Impacts Your Electric Bill Seattle Post Intelligencer
Google tool helps consumers reduce energy usage Reuters
The Tech HeraldNational Business Review
all 227 news articles » GOOG

I was down for a quick chat with google yesterday, but their PR group was slammed, and I’ll have to catch them another time.

Someone asked me who the competition is, and I don’t think anyone has a chance.  I don’t think Amazon would get into this service.  Microsoft?  Here is one blog post that is wrong.


The battle has begun. Software developers everywhere are quickly realizing that the market for energy management applications has enormous potential. But although it’s worthwhile to watch the smaller companies and see if any one of them comes out with the next breakthrough, when players like Google and Microsoft jump into the mix, you know that their product will get far more exposure in the market.
Google’s product, the Google Powermeter, is directed towards the home energy user. It is a web-based graph which shows you how much energy you have been using over the course of the day, and where that energy is being used. What it does not appear to do is give you the ability to remotely control your appliances. Still, knowing where you use the most energy can make a big difference, as a Google employee testifies in a promotional video – he saved $3,000 in one year without any significant lifestyle changes.
Microsoft, on the other hand, is working on a product that appears more robust, and feature-intensive, but not as simple and easy-to-use as the Powermeter (which isn’t surprising when you consider Outlook versus Gmail). The Environmental Dashboard application for Microsoft Dynamics AX is catered to businesses rather than home energy users. Like the Powermeter, the Environmental Dashboard helps businesses analyze and reduce their energy consumption, but it also helps them measure their greenhouse gas emissions.

There is no comparison between Google PowerMeter and Microsoft’s Environmental Dashboard.  In fact, Microsoft’s dashboard could sit on top of Google’s PowerMeter service.

Comments (2) »

Green IT needs to move beyond data centres

Greenbucks continue to go to green technologies even as tech spending hits a rough patch. Governments from China to South Africa to the US to Japan will showcase their commitment to smarter, sustainable infrastructure, as corporates like Google and GE team up to develop advanced software and hardware for smarter electrical grid infrastructure.

Forrester Research senior vice-president, Chris Mines has been leading the charge in advising several of them on environmentally responsible computing. He works with strategists and marketers at global technology suppliers, helping them embrace the increasing importance of environmental considerations in the IT industry. Chris has led Forrester’s overall US research organisation from 2002 to 2006, with responsibility for setting the firm’s research agenda, budgeting and staffing, and developing research methodologies including the Forrester Wave and Technographics. As he gets ready to advice Indian IT leaders at the Nasscom leadership summit, he describes the green IT infrastructure landscape to Pragati Verma. Excerpts:

Most CIOs today equate green IT with data centre efficiency. Do you expect this to spread to other tech applications?

Yes, most of them tend to overfocus on data centres as a pricing centre of energy consuming activity. It is top-of-mind for most people because problems like growth or power capacity limits, and returns like energy cost savings, are highly tangible. It’s easier to see and feel the heat there all the time. They don’t realise that they consume as much energy on their distributed IT infrastructure.

The energy usage and efficiency of desktops, laptops and printers is harder for companies to measure, and harder to control, than the concentrated and tightly managed IT assets in the data centre environment. Capabilities to help the client IT organisations improve PC and peripheral energy efficiency are considerably less common among green IT services providers. This involves employee behaviour, where you have to get employees to switch off PCs—a much tougher task for companies.

Can a slowing economy derail efforts to make IT operations more efficient and less environmentally harmful?

Worldwide implementation of green initiatives in enterprise IT organisations and their suppliers will accelerate in 2009, notwithstanding the gloomy economic environment. A slowing macroeconomy is actually a positive for corporate efforts to make their computing operations more environmentally responsible as companies realise that doing right by the environment aligns with doing right by the business. A greener IT infrastructure is also a more efficient, lower-cost IT infrastructure because of the direct alignment of environmental improvement and cost efficiency in green projects like power management, virtualisation and consolidation of IT hardware, and recycling of old IT systems. Such green IT activities bring concrete, measurable cost reductions and thus will become more broadly adopted in enterprise IT organisations.

While constraints on capital availability could act as a brake on big-bang green IT initiatives like new data centre builds, the net effect of recession and resulting cost-cutting will mean a greater emphasis on green IT initiatives. Green IT will spread in several dimensions: from hardware to software and services; from data centres to distributed IT to IT-enabled public infrastructure; and from energy efficiency to life-cycle accounting of IT’s carbon footprint. However, capital intensive projects like new data centre build-outs won’t happen.

Push to green seemed to get stronger as oil prices were skyrocketing. Do you expect greening to slow down as oil prices dip?

Yes, it would definitely have an impact as cost savings is an important driver. You cannot build as compelling a case at $45 per barrel as at $145 per barrel.

However, green momentum would be difficult to stop now as it is too deep.

Awareness and adoption of green IT seems to vary a lot from country to country. Does size of company also make a difference?

In our studies, we have found no meaningful difference between adoption of green technologies by companies of different sizes. Energy industry and government organisations are typically ahead of the pack. It’s not just the traditional polluters but even banks, retailers and utilities are getting conscious of their green credentials, as customers start appreciating environmentally responsible companies.

Europe tends to lead because of regulatory policy and environment. UK, in particular and other countries in Nordic region, Australia, New Zealand and Canada have legislations and regulatory environment in place. The US tends to trail Europe by about an year and Japan trails the US. Among emerging markets, adoption varies but South East Asia, India and Eastern Europe are next but behind Japan.

Barack Obama and Congressional leaders are preparing rapid legislation to cut US emissions that cause global warming and to kick-start a clean energy revolution. Do you expect US to overtake soon?

Yes, we are seeing a lot of speculation on how economic stimulus package will result in greener America and create several green jobs. Many suppliers are keenly following that and are already showcasing their capabilities and projects. But it won’t be so immediate. Obama administration will take a close look at what EU has done. It is likely to raise visibility of carbon accounting, audits and monitoring of these. The US will take three to four years as carbon accounting is not yet there on planning horizon.

Is regulatory push the primary driver today?

Customer demand is the biggest push. If customers ask for green products and services, companies quickly move to these. That is the primary reason companies like banks and utilities are adopting green practices. Regulatory environment comes next as this could spell out risks they have to deal with for non-compliance. Also, there is an increasing urge to create corporate goodwill.

You mean customers are willing to pay a premium for green products…

In a recent research, we found 15% of consumers telling us they are concerned about environment and will pay a premium for green tech products. You should remember that this is a growing segment and the numbers will only grow appreciably higher in two to five years. People buying tech products have already started asking how green is the product; its packaging and how does one get rid of it without polluting the environment.

Leave a comment »

Is Your Data Center Green?

green2

Reengineering the Data Center to be “Green
…  maximizing energy efficiency does have a measurable ROI

Rapidly rising energy costs have had a major impact on what we pay to drive our cars, heat our homes, and feed our families. And yes, data center operational costs have also been heavily impacted by the rising costs of energy. Especially the cost of energy needed to power and cool our facilities, computer rooms and data centers. In the past year while we have all heard more than our share of manufacturers professing their products to be “Green”, but few have demonstrated objective life-cycle costs and ROI (Return on Investment) data supporting their energy efficient offering. Even with a lack of solid product data, the good news is that going green in the data center does indeed have a measurable ROI, can significantly reduce your organization’s energy costs, and can be achieved with a minimal amount of upfront costs.

The Green IT Bandwagon

In August of 2007, the Environmental Protection Agency published a report to congress on “Server and Data Center Energy Efficiency”. This report detailed the rapidly growing energy costs of data centers ($4.5 billion in 2006, $7.4 billion projected by 2011) and the dramatic increase in data center power consumption (61 billion kWh in 2006, 100 billion projected by 2011). The EPA report also explored implementing a new ENERGY STAR® benchmark for data centers. Since the report’s publication, most major IT manufacturers announced “Green” products and initiatives. The EPA deserves kudos in trying to improve energy efficiency in data centers, but with so many competing manufactures now claiming to have energy efficient products, the prudent approach is to compare competing technologies and evaluate the energy consumption and life-cycle costs of all your new IT acquisitions. Even more important to your data center strategy is first gaining a solid holistic understanding of your data center environment and critical risk factors prior to investing in any new technologies.

The IT Manufacturer Selection Dilemma
Though there are lots of extremely talented and ethical people working for the IT manufacturers whose products fill your computer room or data center, the obvious reality is that their job security depends on their ability to convince you of their products’ superiority. During the 20+ years since I started my IT career as a Systems Engineer with one of the largest global manufacturers of computers and technology products, I have never heard any manufacturer’s representative sincerely recommend going with a superior competing product or solution. Also important to keep in mind is the exponential improvements in technologies we have all seen and how often we have seen competing vendor technologies leapfrog another. Even if a manufacturer could maintain their superior technical edge in one product area, their diversification efforts into other technology areas has seldom achieved the same accolades. The hot sales buzz these days is in convincing you that they have the most green and energy efficient products. In determining how to optimize your data center for energy efficiency, it is key to review independent test results and maintain a vendor and technology agnostic approach.

The Data Center Manager’s Reality
I have had the great fortune during my long technical career to have met with lots of Data Center and Facility Managers and have visited many of the world’s largest and most impressive data centers in North America, Europe, and Asia. Unfortunately, many of these highly skilled Data Center Managers and Computer Room IT professionals are often overworked, and underappreciated. Regardless of how well they manage to keep their systems up and humming the majority of the time, they too often only hear from their managers and non-technical colleagues when they are having issues with down time or system performance. The mantra often heard for datacenter managers is “Uptime, Uptime, Uptime…”, and the press loves to talk in terms of a 99.99% goal. Though uptime is what our IT professionals deliver the vast majority of the time, there are routine maintenance times, upgrades to servers (Moore’s law (transistors on computer processors double approximately every two years), and systems do indeed go down. The dread IT professionals face is downtime due to system failure, lost revenues due to downtime, and naturally dealing with those colleagues and managers who are impacted and frustrated by that downtime.

Traditionally downtime and not efficiency is what IT professionals are often evaluated on. As such, it should be no surprise that their biggest concern is not how energy efficient they are running their power and cooling systems. When we are talking about the most strategic IT Equipment deployed in our data centers, especially our servers, downtime due to heating / airflow issues is the principal concern. To minimize the overheating concern, many IT professionals have resorted to flooding their data center with excess AC (Air Conditioning). Recently I visited such a data center belonging to a huge multi-national corporation. They are working to make this data center more energy efficient now, but for years with all their resources and conviction, they too flooded their computer room with far more AC cooling then needed to insure minimal downtime. Despite how power intensive and costly deploying excess air conditioning is, it is still an extremely common reality for many computer rooms and data centers.

ASHRAE is a global leader in setting data center cooling standards. ASHRAE’s Technical Committee 9.9 (ASHRAE TC 9.9) recommends air entering the servers in the cold aisle to be between 64.4 F and 80.6 F. Our data center managers keep up on the latest recommended ASHRAE Inlet temperature and humidity for our servers, but they can’t know what they can’t measure. Though we can walk though the computer room or down a row of server racks and notice obvious hot spots or blasts of cold air, we cannot easily guess at air temperature or air pressure or if the inlet side of our servers are getting too much or too little air cooling. This too leads to IT professionals over cooling IT equipment to minimize downtime. I will talk more on data center measurement later in this article.

Many corporate executives have limited if any comprehension of the “IT magic” that lets their laptop connect to the network or indeed the technology that runs their company seamlessly on a daily basis. Therefore, another data center issue leading to energy inefficiency is management expectations of their IT people. As many of these IT professionals have engineering backgrounds and other technical certifications, they are often expected to be experts in every technical area and discipline. Expecting a Cisco or Microsoft certified engineer to be an expert in HVAC, is the equivalent in medicine of expecting your pediatrician to perform heart surgery or your podiatrist to provide recommendations on lowering your cholesterol.

This exaggerated expectation of IT bandwidth has historically had a very negative impact on data center energy efficiency. When a IT professional doesn’t have sufficient time, training, or expertise in a peripheral technical area, the result is lack of time devoted to proper due diligence and an overreliance on less then objective vendor “facts”. And, unlike the famous scene from “Miracle on 34th Street” when Santa recommends competing Gimbels over Macys, your vendors will seldom intentionally talk themselves out of a sale.

If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail
It is good to keep this famous Bernard Baruch quote in mind when evaluating your cooling / AC strategy. Expecting an AC equipment manufacturer to recommend cooling practices that minimize the need for buying more CRAC units or AC equipment is like walking into a Hummer showroom and expecting the salesperson to recommend the car industry’s latest hybrid SUVs. If you are lucky you might get a helpful technical resource from an AC vendor to talk about hot aisle / cold aisle best practices. And if you are really lucky, you might be able to wrestle some info out of them on the energy efficiency savings of cold aisle containment vs. hot aisle containment. The challenge in this approach is an energy efficient green datacenter requires less cooling equipment thus mitigating the need to buy as much or even any additional chillers or CRAC units from them.

PUE and DCiE

PUE and its reciprocal DCiE are now widely accepted energy measurement standards that were proposed by the Green Grid to help computer room managers determine how energy efficient their data centers are. 

PUE = Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE)
DCiE = Data Center Efficiency

There is a description of PUE/DCiE in layman terms later in the article.

You can’t control or manage what you don’t measure
Having an holistic understanding or your computer room or data center’s energy consumption is a key first step in being able to determine the appropriate steps necessary to improve your energy efficiency. Measuring should be used as an ongoing tool in your overall data center strategy. CFD measurement at multiple heights in a row of racks along with air pressure measurement under floor tiles can not only help you insure that you are getting enough cool air to the inlet of your servers, it can help you maintain airflow to the recommended ASHRAE level to all IT equipment. This data can also help you eliminate hot aisle / cold aisle containment issues (hot air leaking into the cold aisles and vice versa). With proper power measurement of your overall data center IT equipment and infrastructure, you will be able to determine your PUE and DCiE. As PUE / DCiE are industry standards, determining your data center’s energy efficiency rating will enable you enable you to compare how efficient your facility is compared with other data centers around the world. It also helps you set a benchmark you can track, report, and continually improve. Keeping your data center energy efficient should be an ongoing process. After determining your facility’s efficiency rating, you implement power and cooling best practices to improve efficiency and then monitor how those changes improved your PUE/DCIE. And as you add additional energy efficient IT assets, the process continues showing how much less energy consumption your facility is using. Improvements in your DCiE and PUE correlate to improved efficiency, which in turn demonstrate a measurable reduction in your company’s or organization’s power bill.

Why Concentrate on Cooling and Infrastructure for Energy Efficiency
It is important to understand that any Watts saved on power efficient servers, storage systems, and other IT equipment do indeed have a significant cascading impact on the overall power and cooling you need for your data center. An overall efficiency plan should include careful planning on server virtualization and life-cycle costs of all IT assets, but as the chart above demonstrates, 70% of Data Center Energy is consumed by Infrastructure with 45% being the Cooling and environmental equipment used to maintain proper IT equipment temperatures and airflow. A solid data center energy efficiency strategy requires continuous cooling and power measurement and benchmarking.

What is PUE?  What is DCiE? … in layman’s terms
Companies and organizations need IT equipment to provide the products and services they offer, handle transactions, provide security, and to run and grow their businesses. The larger a company / organization grows the greater the need to house their computer equipment in a secure environment. IT equipment includes computer servers, hubs, routers, wiring patch panels and other network equipment. Depending on size, that secure environment is called a wiring closet, a computer room, a server room, or a data center.  In addition to the energy needed to run that IT equipment, electric power is utilized for lights, security, backup power, and to keep the environmental factors in these rooms at temperature and humidity levels that will minimize down time due to heat issues.  All IT equipment (and anything run on electricity) generates heat.  In a room filled with racks of computers and other IT equipment a significant amount of your energy costs are incurred by specialized data center cooling and power equipment deployed to keep your servers and other IT equipment up and running.  Heat problems in data centers are a leading cause of downtime.

The Good News – Green Data Centers do have a measureable ROI!
Going green in the data center does indeed have a measurable ROI, can significantly reduce in your organization’s energy costs, and can be achieved with a minimal amount of upfront costs. Before making any sizable investments in energy efficient technologies like flywheel UPS systems, liquid cooling, in-row cooling, or air-side economizers; measure and benchmark your current environment to determine your current cooling and airflow issues along with benchmarking your DCiE and PUE.

An excellent place to start is looking at power and cooling best practices which are often relatively easy to implement and relatively inexpensive. Check your hot aisle/cold aisle layout – does all your IT equipment face the same direction or intake air from the same side of the server rack. It sounds obvious but CFD reports from major companies show a surprising amount equipment being mounted the wrong way.  Consider CRAC covers, blanking panels, and sealing cable openings with raised floor grommets. Speak with experts, read up on and consider cold aisle containment and hot aisle containment methods.

Corporations and business leaders are feeling economic pressures as the cost of energy rises. This not only impacts their data center operation costs, but also their plans for supporting new pieces of IT equipment. They, along with public policy makers, also realize that energy consumption as a whole is a critical issue. This, combined with the move towards reduced carbon emissions has all involved looking for ways to move towards defining the metrics of a “green data center.”

Green data center strategies can meet IT availability and performance requirements while impacting the “bottom line” through the reduction of power/energy needs and a more effective use of existing IT equipment. The result is a more profitable data center that achieves or exceeds many if not all corporate environmental sustainability objectives.

Leave a comment »

Visio’s Add-ins for GreenIT – Server Virtualization and HVAC Monitoring

Microsoft has a couple of new Visio Tools to help your Green IT efforts – Server Virtualization inventory and monitoring & HVAC Monitoring.

How to Analyze Rack Server Virtualization
How to Set Up HVAC Monitoring with Visio

Just a few examples of cost-saving scenarios include:

HVAC ReadingHVAC Readings – virtual representations of a data center’s key HVAC data, including temperature and humidity, help companies better manage energy consumption and keep HVAC costs down.
Server Capacity – quickly assess server usage at both the rack and individual server level to help support decisions around shifting workloads to less-utilized boxes and potentially shutting down excess servers in the event of extra capacity.


phasde4

screenshotspeechbubble

Leave a comment »